Pages

21 December 2014

A slight change of emphasis

The reshuffle is interesting for how this government sees itself.

First, it's limited in scope, which reinforces Abbott's idea that there isn't much wrong with the government that a bit of spin can't fix. It also reinforces the idea that shifting some of the government's alternative leaders - Bishop, Turnbull,  and yes even Hockey - would be career-limiting for Abbott.

The only governments that have far-reaching changes to their ministerial line-ups are those in real trouble, like the two reshuffles Labor had in 2013. This government may well have a reshuffle or two on that scale, but not yet.

Abbott has not promoted any big thinkers because he does not want any profound transformations in the way policy is conducted. He does not want to have to defend any controversial ideas on matters about which he knows little and cares less.

Andrews in Defence We're sending our forces into Iraq at a time when warfare, like all other facets of human activity, requires fundamental reexamination of a number of basic assumptions. Australia's strategic environment is shifting fast. Kevin Andrews is not the man to handle that.

If you accept those limitations, then what is needed in that role is a program manager par excellence - someone who will ensure Australian warfighters go into mortal danger relying on kit from the cheapest bidder. He's not that, either.

Andrews holds the fate of a large chunk of the South Australian economy in his hands. He'll give them more than the bugger-all currently on the table now, but not much more. He won't be able to wrest any political credit for that away from the state's Labor Premier, Jay Weatherill, and will be deaf to the screams of SA Liberals on why that matters to them.

Defence is the death-seat of federal politics. Apart from genuine policy nerds like David Johnston and Kim Beazley, every minister for the past 40 years was appointed to that role in full knowledge that their career was over (apart from Joel Fitzgibbon, which demonstrated Rudd didn't get the role Defence plays in foreign policy). Andrews is being managed out of politics.

The mad scheme for Credlin to take his seat remains in place. Only Canberra insiders blithely assume the Victorian Libs will meekly comply with an order issued from Abbott's office. It also means that the constituency of paternalistic religious conservatives will have to be represented by someone else, which will mean someone like Bruce Billson, Tony Smith and/or Michael Ronaldson will come under threat, blood will beget blood, etc.

Morrison to Social Services This assumes Morrison has attained a reputation as a competent administrator, with some sort of magical touch to get things through the Senate. This portfolio covers 20% of the Budget and the fun ain't done in that portfolio. The people most impressed by his tough-guy antics against refugees are older people with few skills, who fret most about refugees taking their jobs, and who are also most affected by changes to pensions or unemployment.

It also assumes Senator Marise Payne, who has basically been responsible for executing policy in this area (and helping outmaneuver Andrews brainfarts like denying young unemployed people support for six months) hasn't done enough to warrant a promotion. Keep this in mind when you cheer Abbott's doubling of female representation in Cabinet (more below).

Dutton to Immigration This assumes the case for our current immigration policy has been made. It hasn't.

Conservatives confuse doltish obstinacy with firm consistency of purpose, which is why they rate Dutton more highly than his talents and record suggest. He was a political passenger, offering nothing against Nicola Roxon or Tanya Plibersek as ministers for health. As minister and now shadow, Catherine King ran rings around him. If Richard Marles takes the kid gloves off in dealing with the new boy, it could be the making of him.

Support for the current immigration regime seems strong but individual incidents puncture it. Polling does not capture this. Morrison starved journalists of detail and derided them for writing rubbish, but they love being put in that bind because they love Strong Narrative over anything else. Morrison, like Howard, had the ability to look plaintive while being inflexible - a tactic that fools journalists - but Dutton can't do that.

Dutton has only two political talents. He picked the Liberal leadership changes since Howard with great accuracy and extracted great deals for himself. He comes from a state that is crucial politically but which doesn't send talented people to Canberra.

Dutton will overreach the wide-ranging powers Morrison won for him. At exactly the wrong moment, Dutton will make a dumb and callous statement that leads to a policy rethink greater than he can handle.

He can plug, plug, plug a message regardless of facts or changing circumstances, a quality prized highly among those who regard politics as a sub-type of public relations. It won't be enough.

Ley in Health Of all the Coalition MPs not initially appointed to Abbott's cabinet, Ley had the strongest case for inclusion. Her appointment is less a what-if than a why-not. She is across the detail and can plug a line as well as anyone while also having a mind of her own. In short, she makes a stronger case for inclusion than almost anyone there now. If anyone is going to come up with a workable arrangement on state funding or NDIS she will do it. She will also counter some of King's work on regional health initiatives.

Ley's appointment is a tacit admission that Dutton failed in Health, and that his failure is politically costly. Peta Credlin had assured female Coalition MPs that there would be more opportunities for them but now we see what that means as far as Abbott is concerned: women tidy up after men.

Frydenberg as Assistant Treasurer This is reward for service to Abbott.

The Assistant Treasurer is basically Minister for Tax. The Budget has a revenue problem and this government will shy away from far-reaching tax reform. Therefore, the battle will be joined at the level of detail: the government will want to close lurks and loopholes while the lobbyists who pushed for them will want them kept open. The Assistant Treasurer will need an eagle eye for detail and a firm commitment to what's right for the country: the 2006 version of Arthur Sinodinos would have been perfect.

Unfortunately, we've got Josh, who has glided through life with a superficial charm designed to disguise his boredom with detail. He's an errand boy. Nobody wants this guy in the trenches when it gets tough, and this is one tough job. He doesn't complement Hockey's weaknesses, he compounds them.

He was in charge of not one but two of Abbott's so-called bonfires of red tape. Rather than do the hard work of identifying and costing (politically as well as economically) counterproductive regulations, Frydenberg slapped together a whole lot of straw men that impressed nobody but press gallery journalists. It was lazy stuff and this blog has had it in for him before he was first elected.

Others who might have done this job better - Little Jimmy Briggs, Kelly O'Dwyer, Christian Porter or even Steve Ciobo - are right to feel passed over for a lesser person. Briggs and Ciobo should be wangling invitations to Mal and Julie's supper club.

The Parly Secs
- Christian Porter (replacing the ousted Johnston from WA) rose fast and far with little competition in his native state, and it will be interesting to see what errands Abbott sends him on.
- Kelly O'Dwyer's investigation into foreign investment in Australian real estate looked like an audition for a higher role (along with hundreds of media appearances where she unblushingly recited the daily inanities), and so it has proven. She risks treading a narrow path with her Treasury background but nobody is obliged to pass up a promotion.
- Karen Andrews is a former Hockey staffer who has taken to the busywork of committees and generally kept her head down while other newbie MPs aare still coming to terms with how the joint works.

Abbott is sending the signal to ambitious MPs that Howard did: knuckle down and do the busywork and I'll call on you in my own good time. Howard regularly broke that rule, with Abbott and Mark Vaile and Petro Georgiou to name a few, but hey.

Abbott deserves all the meagre rewards that come from having taken meagre risks. You, my dear readers, deserve all the best that the festive season and 2015 can offer, so we'll see what happens then.

18 comments:

  1. Andrew,

    As a long-suffering constituent of Mr Frydenberg, just lerve your analysis.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for another great year Andrew, all the best to you and yours for the season. I look forward to some cracking reads next year.

    ReplyDelete
  3. According to Wikipedia, Karen Andrews has worked as a (chemical?) engineer for energy plants as well as run personnel agency. She increases the cabinet understanding of technology by 100%.

    Great stuff as usual, now the Liberal killing season is over you can enjoy your holiday

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thank you for another year of fascinating reading, Andrew. All the best for the Christmas season and a happy and healthy New Year for you and yours.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Morrison's sideways shuffle is interesting. For months now, the more childish LNP die-hards have engaged in a kind of magical thinking in relation to him. There is a genuine sense that any trouble could be solved if only Morrison was asked to deal with it.

    I see things differently. Like many of this front bench, he seems to be a champion High School debater masquerading as a middle-aged social analyst.

    - Joe

    ReplyDelete
  6. Sussan Ley has been given an impossible workload (remember she retains her Parl Sec position and takes on Sport as well, besides having one of the most absurdly designed electorates in the country).

    This is in anticipation that she'll fail, which will be 'proof' that women can't cope and will also curb her ambitions.

    Howard used a similar strategy with presumptuous females whose merit couldn't be ignored - give them an impossible job, watch them fail at it, and then give the (male) replacement all the resources the woman was denied.

    It's a sad day when the governance of the country comes second to slapping down leadership pretenders and paying off score.

    Zuvele Leschen

    ReplyDelete
  7. As always, thanks for the interesting read. All the best for the new year.

    -Melena Santorum

    ReplyDelete
  8. Thanks for another stirling year, Andrew. Am I correct in seeing little but Credlin's hand in the reshuffle? Who do you think are the other fingers on the ouija board?

    ReplyDelete
  9. If Scott Morison is still Social Services Minister at the next election, not only will this be a one-term government, it will be beaten in a landslide.
    I am perplexed that none of the 'strategists' for the coalition have taken any lessons from the Victorian election.

    ReplyDelete
  10. The biggest turd in the punchbowl here is Morrison. Tony's gotten away with having a headkicker in charge of asylum seeker policy only because so many of his supporters are either indifferent or actively hostile to the plight of refugees. But now Morrison gets to apply his heavy handed aggression to Australians. Unfortunately for Morrison, the people he's now charged with kicking shit out of can actually vote.

    He'll overreach of course. Morrison's a brutal bully with a lust for unfettered power and no accountability. Shortly after the 2013 election when he finally gained the authority and office he had so desperately craved for six years he made that video to be shown to newly arrived asylum seekers in detention centers awaiting processing. The image of Scott glowering and threatening down the camera, promising these people that they'll never settle in Australia... you just know that under the desk he had a raging erection going. He's not even fighting an ideological war, he just genuinely derives pleasure from throwing his weight around and punishing people who can't do anything about it, and is convinced this is exactly what the good people of the Shire put him there for.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Is it just me or have all the pundits missed the most obvious point about Morrison's new - expanded - brief? He now has to argue for, and implement, the one Abbott brain-fart - sorry, policy, - that even the Liberal party room think is a dog: gold-plated paid parental leave.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Have a great Christmas Andrew, and hope to read you in 2015.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Andrew you are spot on about Morrison's tough man appeal to certain voters. It is one thing to cheer him on when he is despatching orange lifeboats but quite another when he may have plans to cut your own benefits. The For-Good-Of-The-Country argument would not seem nearly as enticing when the health of one's own allowance is at stake.

    I wonder though how Morrison will approach his new gig. Will he use it as a chance to rehabilitate his image or will he thunder against 'Leaners'. I suspect the latter. There is no going against nature in the jungle.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I'm looking forward to watching Defence destroy Andrews. (I was actually hoping Morrison would get it, but Andrews is a nice consolation prize.)

    ReplyDelete
  15. Andrew,

    Thanks for another year of great insights. Looking forward to your ongoing work in 2015.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I don't think this mob of dysfunctional knobheads see themselves any differently than before, but they think that by shuffling the same deck of cards (albeit letting the Johnson card slip out and fall on the floor) the electorate will have a different view of them.

    Problems are:

    Mr Compassion Morrison to Welfare

    Lady Blah Blah to Health

    Dutton ( the man who may be dead) to Immigration

    The Rinse of Darkness to Defence

    And the list of nastiness and incompetence gores on.

    At least Eric Abetz can do a good impersonation of a Dalek. And as a bonus, he is almost as intelligent.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Christian Porter??? It's several years since he came out of the West to Canberra! Abbott's done a very good job giving him nothing of significance to do since then! My speculations back in June, 2012........

    from http://polliepomes.wordpress.com/2012/06/14/why-leave-the-west/


    Young Christian Porter has come out in the west,
    To say that in Canberra his chances are best.
    His decision could bring his Premier undone
    ‘Cos up until now he’s been Liberal top gun.
    In the East the search for a champion so far
    Has yielded no one to compare with this star.

    He stands tall and strong with a beautiful wife,
    All things a plus for the political life.
    He is fighting fit for the battles to come
    Armies are gathering to the beat of his drum.
    He has rivals in Perth and in Sydney, what’s more,
    Who’d like to unseat him as he rides off to war.

    There’s jovial Joe Hockey and sad Andrew Robb,
    Mad monk Tony too; they all fear for their job.
    But Tony has told him there’s plenty of room
    In his ‘team Abbott’ with its message of doom.
    He’s promised to welcome him, and what is more.
    He’s written that promise in his very own gore.

    So alike, these two blokes. Who’d tell them apart?
    This Christian, like Tony, is no bleeding heart.
    Hard on boat people who dare cross our border,
    He’s always calling for more law and order.
    He wants to help ‘good’ folk to feel more secure,
    With little concern for the young and the poor.

    But poor Tony Abbott is losing his grip
    So Porter’s a favorite for Fed leadership.
    That makes pre-selection much easier for Pearce
    Competition for which has always been fierce.
    Now if Barnett makes offers of doors left ajar
    He can smile ever so sweetly and say, “Au revoir!”

    Where’s the fair damsel in this quest for glory?
    There’s heroine and hero in every story.
    Though he has a wife and no plans to un-marry,
    There's engagement to come with much thrust and parry.
    Yes! More than his match, she will challenge. “En garde!”
    “You’re on!” Oh, why leave the West to take on Gillard!



    ReplyDelete
  18. Still no comments on this article? Strange (I had to comment)

    ReplyDelete